Noeren
Рейтинг:
21.2
21.2
0.0 за неделю
Прогресс до следующей звезды:
Оффлайн
В друзьях у
В заблокированных у
Пока, насколько я вижу, просто никто этому соглашению не следовал и не собираелся. Во всяком случае никто значимый. Ну и давайте уж тогда процитирую вики:
"A pair of studies in Nature have said that, as of 2017, none of the major industrialized nations were implementing the policies they had envisioned and have not met their pledged emission reduction targets,[83] and even if they had, the sum of all member pledges (as of 2016) would not keep global temperature rise "well below 2 °C"."
"Although the agreement was lauded by many, including French President François Hollande and UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon,[64] criticism has also surfaced. For example, James Hansen, a former NASA scientist and a climate change expert, voiced anger that most of the agreement consists of "promises" or aims and not firm commitments.[89] He called the Paris talks a fraud with 'no action, just promises' and feels that only an across the board tax on CO
2 emissions, something not part of the Paris Agreement, would force CO
2 emissions down fast enough to avoid the worst effects of global warming.[89]
Institutional asset owners associations and think-tanks have also observed that the stated objectives of the Paris Agreement are implicitly "predicated upon an assumption – that member states of the United Nations, including high polluters such as China, the US, India, Russia, Japan, Germany, South Korea, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Canada, Indonesia and Mexico, which generate more than half the world's greenhouse gas emissions, will somehow drive down their carbon pollution voluntarily and assiduously without any binding enforcement mechanism to measure and control CO
2 emissions at any level from factory to state, and without any specific penalty gradation or fiscal pressure (for example a carbon tax) to discourage bad behaviour."[90] Emissions taxes (such as a carbon tax) can be integrated into the country's NDC however."
"Coronavirus Is Spreading, but W.H.O. Says It’s Not a Global Emergency"
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/23/health/china-virus-who-emergency.html
"After China first reported a mysterious but small number of pneumonia cases December 31, WHO said in early January that it had asked for more information from Beijing but advised “against the application of any travel or trade restrictions on China based on the current information available on this event.”"
https://www.voanews.com/covid-19-pandemic/who-forefront-coronavirus-fight-not-without-controversy
"The most notorious example came in the form of a single tweet from the WHO account on January 14: “Preliminary investigations conducted by the Chinese authorities have found no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission of the novel #coronavirus.” That same day, the Wuhan Health Commission’s public bulletin declared, “We have not found proof for human-to-human transmission.” But by that point even the Chinese government was offering caveats not included in the WHO tweet. “The possibility of limited human-to-human transmission cannot be excluded,” the bulletin said, “but the risk of sustained transmission is low.”"
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2020/04/world-health-organization-blame-pandemic-coronavirus/609820/