Решение ЕСПЧ: Россия должна немедленно освободить Алексея Навального
Смотрите во всех комментариях страны: пыня положит болт, впряглись за своего агента, эта вмешательство в суверенитет страны, европа ничему не учится и другие
Подробнее
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L’HOMME T:+33 (0)3 88 41 20 18 F:+33 (0)3 88 41 27 30 www.echr.coe.int Г-же МИХАЙЛОВОЙ O.O. МГКА 'Далет7 г. Москва, 107078 РОССИЯ / RUSSIE THIRD SECTION ECHR-LE2.2aR VN/NAB/ech 17 February 2021 BY POST AND E-MAIL (olgamkva@gmail.com; olgamva@gmail.com) Application no. 4743/21 Navalnyy v. Russia Dear Madam, I refer to your correspondence of 20 January 2021 requesting the European Court of Human Rights under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court to order the immediate release of the applicant, to the Registry's letter of 21 January 2021 informing you of the Court's request made to the Government under Rule 54 § 2 (a) to submit information, as well as to the Government's reply of 26 January 2021 and your letter of 3 February 2021 containing the applicant's comments on the above submissions. Decision on interim measure On 16 February 2021 a Chamber of seven judges of the Court decided, in the interests of the parties and the proper conduct of the proceedings before it, to indicate to the Government of Russia, under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court, to release the applicant. This measure shall apply with immediate effect. In taking that decision the Chamber had regard to the nature and extent of risk to the applicant's life, demonstrated prima facie for the purposes of applying the interim measure, and seen in the light of the overall circumstances of the applicant's current detention. This measure has been granted without prejudice to the Court's decision on the merits of the present case and the competence of the Committee of Ministers. Pursuant to Rule 39 § 2 of the Rules of Court, the Committee of Ministers will be informed of this decision. The parties' attention is drawn to the fact that failure of a Contracting State to comply with a measure indicated under Rule 39 may entail a breach of Article 34 of the Convention. In this connection, reference is made to paragraphs 128 and 129 of the Grand Chamber judgment of 4 February 2005 in the case of Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey (applications nos. 46827/99 and 46951/99) as well as point 5 of the operative part. Priority The Court further decided to give priority to the application under Rule 41. EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL OF EUROPE 67075 STRASBOURG CEDEX FRANCE COUR EUROPEENNE DES DROITS DE L’HOMME CONSEIL DE L’EUROPE 67075 STRASBOURG CEDEX FRANCE WNWIPC HMBFE
политота,Приколы про политику и политиков,песочница политоты,Навальный,еспч,удалённое
Еще на тему
http://polit.reactor.cc/post/4692653